Chemtrails/HAARP/Geoengineering - PETITION TO END THEM ALL, PLEASE SIGN IT AND SHARE!!!

A grassroots petition to Congress has been started to demand the immediate cessation of chemtrails, weather modification, geoengineering, solar radiation management and HAARP:

Click HERE to sign it!

Please spread the word about this, ladies and gentlemen. It is critical that this petition receives as many signatures as possible. Feel free to share this post or copy the direct link provided below into your Facebook and Twitter feeds:

http://www.petition2congress.com/12445/petition-against-geoengineeringsolar-radiation-managementchemtrai/#comment-8707645

Thank you!

Princeton to Use Students as Vaccine Experiment Subjects With Rollout of Non-Approved Meningitis Vaccine

Mike Adams
Natural News

Princeton University is poised to move forward on a plan that would transform the entire student body into human guinea pigs for a campus-wide vaccine medical experiment. Responding to nothing more than a handful of students contracting mild meningitis (and then fully recovering), Princeton now wants to inject ALL students with a vaccine that isn't even approved for use in the United States, thereby making it a vaccine experiment with unknown outcomes that must, by definition, include risk.

Meningitis is often spread through people sharing drinking cups, but like nearly all communicable diseases, it is easily conquered by a healthy immune system (which is, of course, supported by good nutrition). Even the small number of students who contracted meningitis at Princeton were able to conquer it without serious incident, and most college students live on processed junk food and atrocious diets!

Princeton falls for quack science of the for-profit vaccine industry

Princeton, much like every other academic institution across America, seems to have fallen for the corporate-engineered propaganda of the vaccine industry and its for-profit junk science which claims that every disease occurs solely because of a lack of a vaccine.

That's why every time there's even a tiny number of mild sicknesses, everybody who doesn't know much about the reality of vaccines leaps to the fear-induced mania of "WE ALL NEED MORE VACCINES!"

The vaccine industry and CDC, of course, propel the fear mongering as a way to drive more business to vaccine manufacturers. That's why vaccine companies have actually been caught producing fraudulent science and spiking clinical trial blood samples to defraud the public into thinking vaccines offer protection against disease even when they clearly don't.

Meningitis vaccines cause paralysis

Absent from this discussion of vaccines by Princeton officials is any recognition whatsoever of the inherent risk associated with vaccines.

Princeton officials, much like everyone else who buys into the vaccine fairy tale, assumes vaccines pose ZERO risk to those who receive them. This assumption is scientifically false.

In fact, there is no such thing as a 100% safe vaccine. All vaccines present risks, and as a point in fact on all this, 50 children in an African village were left paralyzed by a meningitis vaccine.

After those children were paralyzed by the vaccine, the government tried to buy the silence of the parents with cash payoffs, much like the secret Vaccine Injury Compensation court in the USA. All across the planet, the "scientific" suppression of vaccine injuries is systematic. Governments, drug companies, health regulators and even medical journals all conspire to pretend that vaccines have zero risks and therefore can be injected without limit into anyone and everyone regardless of their current health status, heavy metal burden or immune system state.

If Princeton injects 10,000 college students with a meningitis vaccine, they are likely to CAUSE more cases of meningitis than have already occurred. These new cases of meningitis, of course, will be celebrated as a reason why even more students need to get injected with even more vaccines. No one will ask whether these new cases of meningitis were caused by the first round of vaccines because it is falsely assumed that vaccines are incapable of causing disease. This is how vaccine marketing works: The diseases caused by the vaccines become the fear mongering marketing push for yet more vaccine injections that cause yet more disease and so on. It's the perfect commercial fraud: the product actually causes the fear that results in more product being sold, resulting in yet more fear, etc.

There is no scientific scrutiny allowed to be applied to any of this. Vaccine advocate are cognitively unable to even entertain the concept that some vaccines may be unsafe, or that vaccines may actually contain live viral strains which are not sufficiently weakened to remain inert. This is despite the fact that global vaccine material suppliers have been caught using LIVE viruses instead of weakened ones.

Thanks to the dogmatic, anti-science state of today's vaccine industry, anyone who questions the safety of vaccines is immediately subjected to the junk science dogma / delusional thinking of vaccine advocates who essentially believe their vaccines are MAGIC in that they deliver 100% benefits and 0% risks (an impossibility in any medication, especially medicines which are injected).

Thus, the entire vaccine industry is supported not by science but by dogma and profit. Real science is not allowed in the vaccine industry, and intelligent questions are shouted down by vaccine dogmatists who are almost universally receiving enormous sums of money from vaccine companies in the form of patent royalties, kickbacks or bribes (also known as exorbitant "speaking fees").

Princeton may be sued by those harmed by experimental vaccines

Princeton may also have legal exposure if the experimental vaccines it offers students cause paralysis or meningitis. While vaccine manufacturers themselves have been granted blanket immunity by the United States government (which is all part of the vaccine injury suppression effort), those who dispense vaccines have separate legal liability if they fail to inform vaccine recipients of the risks the vaccine may impart.

Thus, the only way Princeton can reduce its own legal exposure is to require students to sign disclaimer forms that fully explain the risks associated with the vaccine. Those risks must, by definition, include the risk of paralysis, seizures, meningitis and death.

Princeton's legal risk is further deepened by the fact that this particular vaccine has never been approved by the FDA for use in the United States rendering it an "experimental" vaccine.

In addition, Princeton is now facing the ethical question of whether transforming its entire student body into vaccine lab rats for the pharmaceutical industry falls within the ethical boundaries that exist at the institution (if they exist at all). Given the long history of U.S. academics collaborating with drug companies -- including those with Nazi ties -- to use prisoners, minorities and other targeted groups as lab rats in deadly medical studies, if Princeton chooses to go down this path, it will only add its name to this long list of human medical experiments already conducted in the United States since 1833:

Human medical experimentation timeline, part one:
http://www.naturalnews.com/019189_human_medi...

Human medical experimentation timeline, part two:
http://www.naturalnews.com/019187_human_medi...

Should a fatality occur from the vaccine, Princeton will also highlight its name in the news as "the university that kills its own students with off-label medical experiments."

Reward for any Princeton student who sends Natural News this disclaimer form

If Princeton does offer these vaccines along with a disclaimer form, Natural News would be very interested in publishing that form in the public interest. We would also like to hear from any students who experience side effects after receiving the vaccines.

The first person who can get their hands on this form (if it exists) and forward it to Natural News will be rewarded with a substantial quantity of free nutritional items from the Natural News Store, which we will ship at our cost to your address of choice in the United States.

Contact us through our feedback form to submit this information if you have it.

Learn more about the vaccine injury cover-up:

8 More Reasons I Haven't Vaccinated My Daughter

Posted on: 

Wednesday, November 20th 2013 at 8:15 am

Written By: 

James Maskell

Last week, my first blog on this very sensitive topic called "8 Reasons I Haven't Vaccinated my Daughter" went viral on MindBodyGreen, being shared almost 50,000 times in the first week. There has been such an outpouring of support from all over the world that has been very humbling. Given the imminent direction vaccination policy in going, it seems like a good time to speak up.

The original article I wrote had 15 reasons, but after editing it was turned into eight. Here are eight more that didn't make the cut, that I thought GreenMedInfo readers might like.

1.  I can't trust vaccine studies to be true.

We all love studies, right? Let's start off with one that I believe may be the most important study of all. This gem caught my attention because it examined the "undue industry influence that distorts healthcare research, strategy, expenditure and practice." The conclusion reads, "to serve its interests, the industry masterfully influences evidence-base production, evidence synthesis, understanding of harms issues, cost-effectiveness evaluations, clinical practice guidelines and healthcare professional education and also exerts direct influences on professional decisions and health consumers."

The key word there is masterfully, because it wouldn't be masterful if everyone knew it was going on. The fact that marketing is spun to be made to look like pure science is the true "mastery".

Any one of these factors in isolation might be enough to make anyone doubt whose interests are being served by pro-vaccine research, but all together and working synergistically? Given the scope of this conclusion, it seems unlikely that a doctor or hospital will provide the most objective opinion, given their exposure to the 'direct influences' from pharmaceutical companies that have paid over $11bn in fines in the last three years for criminal wrongdoing.

2.  I believe the benefits of vaccines have been exaggerated.

I already hear you saying, "But James, how can you say that about vaccines? We all know that vaccines have saved millions of lives." Well, when you talk about saving lives, you are talking about reducing mortality. And when we look at the mortality presumably impacted by vaccines, we see a different picture than we have been told is true.  There is no doubt that sanitation, nutrition and socioeconomic factors played a much greater role in reducing mortality from communicable diseases than vaccines.

Graph Courtesy of HealthSentinel.com

Prime example: measles. Mortality reduced 99.5% before the vaccine was introduced in 1963. Notice also, scarlet fever follows the same pattern of decline without the use of a vaccine ever. Even polio deaths were reduced 47% in the USA and 55% in the UK before the first vaccine was introduced, and were falling. How far could we have gone without vaccines? We will never know.

Since my article has come out, Dr. Suzanne Humpries has written a very well thought out piece on this exact topic, you can find it here. I challenge anyone to read that and still be 100% pro-vaccine.

3.  There is evidence of vaccines causing chronic and autoimmune disease

In my previous article, I detailed at least six chronic conditions proven to have come from vaccines. Given the ridiculously short observation periods and underreporting of the numbers, there is likely be a lot more.

This study from Japan spells it out clearly regarding vaccines and autoimmunity. "Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host's immune 'system' by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system's self-organized criticality."

Please know, I am not saying that vaccines cause all chronic diseases, but we are getting precious few answers as to what is causing them, and the answers that are starting to come are pointing atexcessive toxicity or medical interventions, of which vaccines are both (see point #9).  If you really want to be 'one less', in my view, it is better to be one less iatrogenic death (caused by doctors or medicine, the #3 killer in America).

4.  The history of polio has been distorted.

The first thing anyone says when you discuss not giving vaccines is 'do you want her to get polio?' Obviously not, although 'getting' polio and being paralyzed are two completely different things, given that 95% of polio cases are asymptomatic. Furthermore, polio has been consistently reclassified over the last 50 years so that many diseases we called polio at one time are no longer called that. This reclassification is not just an American trait, though.

In India in 2012, they celebrated a whole year going by without a polio death. Great news, hey! But have you heard of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis? A new study revealed that rates of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) have increased 1200% since the oral polio vaccine was introduced a decade ago. Bear in mind NPAFP is "clinically indistinguishable" from wild polio.  Clinically. Indistinguishable.We may have eliminated a virus, but we have not eliminated paralysis, which, after all, should have been the goal of the program.
So, has polio been "eradicated" or reclassified?

Also, you most likely source of getting polio in America in the last 60 years was actually from a polio vaccine. In 1955, in what is now referred to as the 'Cutter Incident', 120,000 people were mistakenly vaccinated with live polio. Whoops!

5. Eradication of the Disease is NOT the same as Eradication of the Microbe

Another common misconception is that vaccines kill off the actual microbes themselves. All of the microbes we vaccinate for still exist in our environment (and in some cases in our guts!), the vaccine program (along with other synergistic medical and social improvements) has got the human race to a point where the majority of them do not cause symptomatic infection. It is easy to make that mistake, granted, because the topic is often confused in the media.

6. Is the germ theory dead?

The germ theory underpins all of our current medical paradigm, including vaccines. I'm not sure the exact date that the germ theory died, but when the most effective treatment for an infection that is incurable with antibiotics is taking pills filled with human feces, you can be sure it is on it's last legs.

Perhaps the recent admission from the director of the CDC that we have "reached the end of the antibiotic era. Period" might make us think twice about building health strategies based on a flawed model.

Antoine Bechamp must be rolling in his grave, because it is looking more and more like he was right when he said "Le terrain est tout, le microbe n'est rien" or "the terrain is everything, the microbe is nothing".

7. I have researched the ingredients in vaccines. They are toxic, even carcinogenic; I do not want them injected into my daughter.

Before I discuss the ingredients themselves, there are four things to appreciate about toxicity and how it affects the body.

First, my baby's blood brain barrier (BBB) is still developing. The BBB protects the brain part of the brain known as the cerebellum, which is largely responsible for balance and gait.
Second, chemicals injected into the arm/leg are then absorbed directly into the blood stream. This has a potentially higher rate of toxicity than if those chemicals were inhaled or deposited into the alimentary canal. Our bodies team up with our microbial friends to create an amazing system for dealing with environmental toxicity, but that counts for nothing if the toxin is injected.

Third, toxicity can be transgenerational. Did you see the abnormalities of the grandkids of Vietnamese sprayed with Agent Orange? If I vaccinate my daughter today, and she seems to be relatively unscathed by the events, could I be giving my great-granddaughter autism or diabetes or autoimmune disease? No one can answer this question assuredly.

Fourth, toxicity between chemicals and metals have a synergistic effect. This means that if more than one toxin is present there is multiplier effect.

So what are the ingredients in vaccines? Unfortunately they are way too many to go over in detail in this post. Here are a few of the worst offenders (and remember the synergy!)

8.  I have done my homework and I know that history will eventually repeat itself. I don't want my daughter to be a statistic.

While our parents lived through the issues with tobacco science, most of us who are new parents today are too young to remember all the commotion. As the well worn, but not particularly well heeded, saying goes 'those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.'

The conclusion of the first study I quoted in this piece went on to state, "there is an urgent need for regulation and other action towards redefining the mission of medicine towards a more objective and patient-. population- and society-benefit direction that is free from conflict of interests."

Whatever your views on vaccines, you can surely agree with this last sentence. Regulation is obviously not going to get us there soon enough and so "other action" is required.

Over the last 8 years, I have been developing an understanding of what it would take to develop this new model. My new venture is called Revive Primary Care, we sold out our initial membership and are now looking to scale it across America, the world. If this article speaks to you, I ask you to take action and join us.

[Note: For additional vaccine research use the GreenMedInfo.com Health Guide: Vaccine Research.]

Year-Round Survival: $300 Underground Greenhouse Could Change How We Eat

Elizabeth Renter - Natural Society

The “Walipini” is an underground greenhouse developed for South American mountain regions over twenty years ago. It was made to allow for edible plants to be grown year-round, no matter how severe the winter got. It’s cheap, simple, and could change everything.

Dad Arrested For Trying to Pick His Children Up From School, Nanny State Says He 'Broke the Rules'

Jason Howerton - The Blaze

A Tennessee father was arrested for disorderly conduct last week after objecting to an official school policy that apparently prohibited him from picking up his children on foot ahead of the majority of parents picking their children up in their cars.

The new student pick-up policy, which reportedly started last week, says that parents can only pick up their children after 2 p.m. by waiting in a line of cars until everyone is released at 2:35 p.m. In this particular case, the parent was walking, so it wouldn’t make much sense to wait in the line of cars.

The Synchronicity and Meditation Connection

Dr. Robert Puff, Ph.D., Meditation for Health
Waking Times

You’re talking to a friend and there’s a pause in the conversation. You break the silence by saying what just popped in your mind. Your friend responds with, “No way! I was thinking the exact same thing.”

You stumble upon a friend’s number in your address book; you decide to give her a ring to see how she is. She picks up the phone and shares that her grandmother just died, and she really needed your support. You reached out to her at the precise moment that she was seeking comfort.

Events like these have a small probability of occurring, yet they still happen. Some would call them coincidences. But I encourage you to think differently. The focus of this post is on the phenomenon called synchronicity.

Mainstream Media Attempts to Smear David Icke

The mainstream media is trembling at the thought of The People's Voice making a huge positive impact on the world by exposing the lies and deceit and thus their fear has driven them to attack TPV founder and visionary, David Icke.

Mick Meaney
RINF Alternative News

In what appears to be an increasing trend across the western corporate media, another researcher investigating the globalist agenda has become the target of yet another smear campaign.

Today David Icke, the UK’s most prominent and outspoken activist, is the subject of a report in The Daily Mirror tabloid over the death of a young man, Luke Monrose, who tragically drowned in Cornwall last May.

Yes, you read that correctly, the incident happened in May but only now 6 months on is David Icke’s name being mentioned in conjunction with the death – and only by the corporate media, suspiciously just days before he launches a revolutionary new web TV and radio stationthat is, coincidentally, dedicated to exposing the corruption of the ruling elite and their subservient media.